Meta-analysis may make things more confusing
What with possible publication bias (null hypothesis fulfilled is pretty boring) or rare sourcing of actual raw data, how is one supposed to know what's right?
where ignorance meets a little less ignorance
What with possible publication bias (null hypothesis fulfilled is pretty boring) or rare sourcing of actual raw data, how is one supposed to know what's right?
Posted by echo at Tuesday, August 07, 2007
No comments:
Post a Comment